attempt to establish a mathematically rigorous aesthetic theory that is based on objectification of perception and effort to bridge philosophy, psychology, aesthetics, sciences, and art theory
— https://medium.com/designscience/1960s-d611bd76d056 ↗
interested not in "thinking machines" but "machines that make us think" (Tools for Thinking, Bicycle for the Mind)
The work of art is more amenable to cybernetic analysis than a work of science, precisely because its criteria of validity are much less exact and above all much less coherent than those of the latter. Non-representational art in particular claims only that a certain quantity of order is present in the product to give it a consumer value, without indicating the distribution of that quantity of order existing in the different levels of this hierarchy of utilized semantemes.
170 words last tended to on 2022-03-02 — let me know what you think